CNIPA Sanctioned 3 Chinese Trademark Firms For Forging Evidence

2022-07-02 04:11:38 By : Mr. Frank Yan

Per a Notice (“蓝天行动”:严厉打击商标代理伪造证据行为) released June 21, 2022, China’s National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has sanctioned three Chinese trademark firms for forging evidence in applications for geographical indications (GI). A GI is a distinctive sign used on products that have a specific geographic origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin. Two agencies were fined 40,000 RMB each and a third was fined 20,000 RMB as well as issued warnings. In addition, the responsible individuals also issued warnings and fined.

In the process of applying for the trademark for the geographic indication “Guanmen Hongmei”, a Sichuan trademark agency tampered with the Annals of Nanjiang County; a Hebei Intellectual Property Agency tampered with the Notice of Qiu County during the course of applying for the trademark for the geographic indication “Qiu County Abalone Mushrooms.” In the process of applying for trademark with geographic indication on “Shaoguan Triangle” and “Shaoguan Bighead Bream” on behalf of a company in Shaoguan, a Shaoguan firm  tampered with the Shaoguan Yearbook (1996—2000), Shaoguan Yearbook (2009) and Shaoguan Municipal Records (1988—2000). The above-mentioned three trademark agencies submitted the altered materials as evidence to the CNIPA, which violated the relevant provisions of the Trademark Law, and, after the trademark law enforcement department where they were located investigated and obtained evidence, imposed a warning and a fine of 40,000 RMB upon the Sichuan agency according to law; a warning and a fine of 40,000 RMB imposed upon the Hebei agency; and a warning and a fine of 20,000 RMB against the Shaoguan firm. Further, the administrative penalties of warning and fine of undisclosed amount were imposed on the relevant liable persons.

will continue to crack down on trademark agency violations of laws and regulations in accordance with the highest standards, strongest measures, and strictest requirements, increase public exposure, further purify the trademark agency market, and promote the standardized development of the trademark agency industry.

The Notice can be found here (Chinese only).

Aaron Wininger is a Senior Attorney and Schwegman’s Director of China Intellectual Property. Aaron counsels both U.S. and Chinese companies on portfolio development and preparation of their patent applications and office action responses. He has worked with clients in the areas of software, networks (wired and wireless), lasers, medical devices, semiconductors and physics.

Aaron prosecutes both Chinese and U.S. trademarks. He has also drafted and prosecuted hundreds of U.S. and international patent applications in a broad spectrum of areas, including computer hardware and software,...

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.